Potential Shift In Immigration Authority To Provinces

Federal Proposals to Expand Provincial Control Over Immigration

In a significant policy shift, the Liberal government has proposed regulatory amendments that would expand the authority of Canada’s provincial and territorial governments over immigration. If passed, these changes would grant provinces more control over who can immigrate through the Provincial Nominee Program (PNP)—a move that could reshape the future of Canada’s immigration system.

The Provincial Nominee Program overview

Established in 1998, the PNP allows provinces and territories (except Quebec and Nunavut) to nominate individuals for permanent residency based on local economic and labor needs. Nominees are assessed on factors like:

  • Education level

  • Work experience

  • Language proficiency

  • Potential for economic integration

However, under current regulations, the federal government retains the authority to re-evaluate nominations, often filtering them through a broader national lens.


As part of a federal red tape reduction initiative, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has proposed amendments that would streamline the immigration process by:

  • Eliminating federal reassessment of PNP candidates' education and skills

  • Giving provinces full responsibility for determining economic establishment and residency intent

  • Maintaining federal “final selection authority” over immigration approvals

This move is intended to enhance efficiency and better align immigration decisions with regional labor market demands.

Why Provinces Want More Control

Canada’s premiers—particularly Ontario Premier Doug Ford—have long called for greater control over immigration to address local labor shortages and tailor policies to their unique economic realities. They argue that provinces better understand their workforce needs than the federal government does. This push for decentralization comes amid broader national debates over Canada’s immigration levels, as the federal government recently reduced PNP allocations from 110,000 to 55,000 spots to slow immigration growth.


Quebec already operates a distinct immigration system through a special agreement with the federal government. It selects immigrants based on its own criteria, prioritizing French language skills and cultural integration. The proposed changes will not affect Quebec's existing authority.

Potential Benefits and Risks of The New Approach

While the new amendments could make the immigration system more responsive at the regional level, experts warn of potential inconsistencies between provincial and federal goals. For instance:

  • Federal immigration pathways often favor high-skilled immigrants

  • Provinces may prioritize low-skilled labor for sectors like agriculture, hospitality, or construction

A 2024 report from Ontario’s Auditor General criticized the province’s PNP for not aligning with its own labor market data, noting that many in-demand occupations were underrepresented among nominees.

What This Means for The Future of Immigration

If these regulatory changes go forward, immigrants looking to settle in Canada may face different criteria depending on the province they apply to. This shift could open up more pathways for economic migrants but may also complicate national integration efforts.

The IRCC has said the changes are necessary to “enhance program responsiveness to regional economic needs, reduce duplication, and improve processing efficiency”, as well as stating “It would also strengthen federal-provincial collaboration and accountability”. The department says that while overall immigration numbers through the PNP will remain capped, the process will become more regionally targeted and efficient.

Final Thoughts: A New Era in Canadian Immigration Policy?

The proposed immigration reform marks a potential turning point in Canada’s immigration policy, shifting greater responsibility to the provinces. While this may empower local governments to address regional workforce challenges more effectively, it also raises questions about national cohesion, labor standards, and long-term integration.

As immigration continues to shape Canada’s economic and demographic landscape, these developments will be closely watched by policymakers, newcomers, and employers alike.

Have Questions About Immigration and Applications?

📞 Contact us today for a consultation and find out how we can help with your journey into Canada.

Previous
Previous

Canada’s New Immigration Plan: Balancing Talent and Capacity in a Changing Global Landscape

Next
Next

Citizenship by Descent in Canada: What the Proposed Changes Mean for Children Born or Adopted Abroad