Immigration Appeal Lawyer Canada
Immigration application refused? Ayodele Law helps individuals and families appeal IRCC refusals, sponsorship refusals, and visa decisions across Canada. Speak with an immigration appeals lawyer near you today.
Challenging Immigration Refusals, Removal Orders & Unreasonable Delays
When an immigration application is refused or a removal order is issued, the next step matters. At Ayodele Law, we represent individuals and families in immigration appeals and court challenges involving decisions made by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, the Immigration Appeal Division, and the Federal Court of Canada.
Immigration Appeals & Legal Remedies We Handle
Not every refusal can be appealed in the same way. Some decisions allow for a formal appeal, others require judicial review, and some are best addressed through alternative remedies. Below is an overview of the options we regularly advise on.
This page provides an overview of the appeal and remedy options available under Canadian immigration law and links to more detailed guidance for each pathway.
Reconsideration Requests (IRCC)
Used when an immigration application has been refused due to an error, misunderstanding, or missing information.
A reconsideration request asks IRCC to review its decision without initiating formal litigation and may resolve the matter more efficiently in appropriate cases.
Sponsorship Appeals
Appeals for refused spousal, common-law, child, or other family sponsorship applications.
These appeals allow the Immigration Appeal Division to consider humanitarian and compassionate factors in addition to legal issues.
Immigration Appeal Division (IAD)
Appeals involving sponsorship refusals, residency obligation breaches, and certain removal orders.
The IAD is one of the few forums where legal arguments and equitable considerations can be assessed together.
Removal Order Appeals
For individuals facing deportation, exclusion orders, or removal from Canada.
These matters are often time-sensitive and may involve parallel remedies to preserve legal options.
Federal Court Appeals & Judicial Review
Used when no statutory right of appeal exists but the decision may be unreasonable or procedurally unfair.
Judicial review focuses on legal error rather than re-arguing the underlying facts.
Writ of Mandamus (Unreasonable Delay)
Used when IRCC has failed to make a decision within a reasonable period of time.
A mandamus application asks the Federal Court to compel IRCC to make a decision where delay has become unreasonable.
Refugee Appeals
Appeals following refused refugee claims or negative Refugee Appeal Division decisions.
These cases often involve credibility findings, country-condition evidence, and procedural fairness issues.
Deferral Requests
Requests to temporarily halt removal while legal remedies are being pursued.
A deferral is not a standalone appeal, but a procedural safeguard used in urgent removal situations.
Permanent Residency Obligation Appeals
Appeals involving allegations that a permanent resident has failed to meet residency requirements.
These cases often rely heavily on humanitarian and compassionate considerations.
Why Immigration Appeals Require Legal Strategy
Immigration appeals are legal proceedings, not administrative re-applications. Each pathway has strict deadlines, jurisdictional limits, and strategic implications. Choosing the wrong remedy can permanently eliminate otherwise viable options.
Our role is to assess:
Whether an appeal right exists
Whether judicial review is appropriate
Whether alternative remedies may resolve the issue more effectively
Speak with an Immigration Appeals Lawyer
If you’ve received a refusal, negative decision, or removal order, it’s important to seek legal advice before taking further action. Many appeal rights expire within days or weeks.
Have a question? Contact us below.
Frequently Asked Questions
Still have questions? Take a look at the FAQ or reach out anytime. If you’re feeling ready, go ahead and apply.
-
Not all immigration refusals can be appealed. Some decisions allow a formal appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division, while others must be challenged through judicial review in Federal Court or addressed through alternative remedies such as a reconsideration request or a mandamus application. Determining the correct pathway depends on the type of application and the decision issued.
-
Appeal deadlines are strict and vary depending on the type of decision. In many cases, appeal or court filing deadlines can be as short as 15 to 30 days. Missing a deadline may permanently eliminate your right to challenge the decision, which is why legal advice should be sought as soon as possible after a refusal or removal order.
-
Reapplying is not always the best option. Submitting a new application without addressing the reasons for refusal can lead to repeated refusals and a weaker record. In many cases, an appeal, judicial review, or reconsideration request may be the more effective strategy. The appropriate response depends on why the application was refused and whether appeal rights exist.
-
An appeal allows the decision-maker to reconsider the case and, in some situations, consider humanitarian and compassionate factors. Judicial review, on the other hand, focuses on whether the original decision was unreasonable or procedurally unfair. Judicial review does not involve re-hearing the case on the merits and is often the only option when no appeal right exists.
-
In some situations, removal can be temporarily halted while legal remedies are being pursued. This may involve filing an appeal where permitted, requesting a deferral of removal, or pursuing court-based remedies. Each case is highly time-sensitive, and early legal intervention is critical.