Senate Recommends Removing Broad Immigration Powers from Bill C-12: What It Could Mean for PR and Refugee Claimants

Canada’s proposed border legislation, Bill C-12, is now under close review in the Senate — and immigration measures within the bill are drawing significant concern.

A Senate committee has recommended that key immigration-related provisions either be removed or significantly amended. Witnesses, including the Canadian Bar Association and Amnesty International, warned that the bill may violate principles of procedural fairness and could create a two-tier asylum system.

If passed in its current form, Bill C-12 could expand the federal government’s authority to:

  • Cancel or modify existing immigration documents

  • Restrict eligibility for certain refugee claims

  • Broaden information-sharing powers

  • Apply certain rules retroactively

For permanent residents, refugee claimants, and individuals with pending applications, these proposed changes raise important legal questions. Below is what you need to know.

What Does Bill C-12 Propose?

The immigration-related sections of Bill C-12 would introduce new powers affecting refugee eligibility, document cancellation, and information-sharing.

One of the most controversial measures would allow the federal cabinet to cancel or modify immigration documents — including permanent resident cards and applications already in process — if deemed to be in the “public interest.”

Another proposed provision would bar certain refugee claims if the claimant first entered Canada more than one year before making the claim. That rule would apply retroactively to June 24, 2020. Immigration Minister Lena Diab told the committee that approximately 37% of asylum claims filed between June and October 2025 could have been disallowed under this measure.

Why the Senate Is Concerned

The Senate social affairs committee recommended that the national security committee either remove these immigration provisions entirely or significantly amend them.

Key concerns raised by witnesses included:

  • Lack of procedural fairness safeguards

  • Risk of a two-tier refugee system

  • Broad and undefined “public interest” cancellation powers

  • Retroactive application of refugee eligibility rules

  • Insufficient parliamentary oversight

The committee also recommended:

  • Increasing the one-year asylum ineligibility period to five years

  • Removing retroactive application

  • Adding stronger parliamentary oversight

  • Exempting permanent residents and naturalized citizens from expanded information-sharing

  • Introducing mandatory privacy commissioner review

The bill is now undergoing clause-by-clause review in the Senate, where amendments may still be introduced.

What Could This Mean for You?

The table below outlines how the proposed measures may affect individuals — and when legal advice becomes essential.

Immigration Risk Area What This Could Mean & How Ayodele Law Can Help
Permanent Residence Cancellation Powers Bill C-12 proposes giving the federal government authority to cancel or modify immigration documents — including permanent resident cards — in the “public interest.” If your PR status is questioned or cancelled, early legal strategy is critical. Our Immigration Appeals practice helps protect permanent residents before the Immigration Appeal Division and Federal Court.
Refugee Claim Ineligibility (Retroactive Rules) Proposed retroactive rules could render certain asylum claims ineligible if filed more than one year after entry to Canada. If your eligibility is challenged, experienced representation before the Immigration and Refugee Board can significantly impact outcomes.
Expanded Information-Sharing Powers The bill would broaden the government’s ability to share immigration-related personal information across departments and potentially with foreign governments. We assess privacy implications and procedural fairness issues where disclosure may negatively impact your status or application.
IRB Delays & Backlogs With approximately 300,000 refugee claims pending, delays remain significant. If your application has been unreasonably delayed, a Writ of Mandamus application may compel IRCC to make a decision and move your case forward.

The Bigger Legal Issue: Procedural Fairness

One of the core principles of Canadian administrative law is procedural fairness — the right to:

  • Know the case against you

  • Respond meaningfully

  • Have a fair hearing before rights are removed

Broad cancellation powers without clear safeguards raise serious legal questions. If enacted and used aggressively, such measures could lead to Federal Court litigation and constitutional challenges.

What Happens Next?

The Senate’s national security committee is reviewing the bill and may introduce amendments. It is still possible that:

  • The immigration sections are removed entirely

  • Oversight provisions are strengthened

  • Retroactive elements are eliminated

  • The bill is delayed or substantially modified

For now, nothing has changed in the law — but the direction of policy is important.

What Should Permanent Residents and Claimants Do?

There is no immediate need for panic.

However, if you are:

  • A permanent resident facing potential revocation issues

  • A refugee claimant unsure about eligibility

  • An applicant with a significantly delayed file

  • Concerned about document cancellation or fairness

It is important to understand your legal position early. At Ayodele Law, we assist clients with:

Policy changes often create uncertainty — but informed, strategic action makes a significant difference. Contact an Immigration Lawyer at Ayodele Law today.

Final Thoughts

Bill C-12 highlights a broader trend: increased focus on border control and asylum system management. At the same time, Senate scrutiny shows that concerns about fairness, oversight, and human rights remain central to Canada’s immigration framework.

As the bill moves forward, individuals affected by immigration decisions should pay close attention — particularly where rights, status, or applications could be at risk.

If you are unsure how proposed changes may affect your case, professional legal advice can provide clarity and protection.

Next
Next

Canada Slashes Immigrant Settlement Funding: What This Means for Newcomers in Ontario